Echo the structure first
Ask for every slide number and title before any summary. If a number is missing or the order drifts from your deck, the file did not come through the way you expect. Fix that first.
Slide-aware summaries
Drop a deck into ZeroTwo, choose a model, and ask for a summary that cites a slide for every claim. Below you will find which slide types to send to which model first, and the short check to run before a summary leaves your hands. Routing is manual: you pick the model for each run, and this page does not claim that ZeroTwo switches models per slide on its own.
TL;DR. [One sentence: the decision or finding] (slides [n] to [m])
Verify before forwarding
[Metric] on slide [n]: compare with the chart. [Action item]: [owner], slide [n].
A deck is a mix of slide types, and each one wants a different summary. Use the matrix to decide the format and the model to try first. These are our starting points, written from how the models are generally described. We have not tested slide types against models, so compare two on the slides that matter.
| Slide type | What is on it | Summary format | Model to try first | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title / cover | Deck title, presenter, date | One-line citation | GPT-5 | Short rephrasing of metadata; any model will do. |
| Agenda / contents | Section headers | Verbatim list | Any model | Nothing to interpret, so copy it rather than rewrite it. |
| Narrative | Body paragraphs, a thesis | Two or three bullets | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Worth trying where staying close to the source wording matters. |
| Data table | Rows of numbers | Top three figures and one trend | GPT-5 | Worth trying for pulling a few figures out cleanly. Check each against the table. |
| Chart or graph | Axes and a visual trend | The trend in one sentence, plus values printed on the chart | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Worth trying for reading chart structure. A value not printed on the slide is an estimate. |
| Quote or testimonial | A pull quote | Verbatim, or skip | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | A quote should not be paraphrased, so keep it word for word. |
| Image or diagram | A diagram or screenshot | Caption in alt-text style | Gemini 2.5 Pro or Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Needs a model that reads images; compare two on the same slide. |
| Section divider | A transition slide | Skip | None | No information to summarize. |
| Appendix | Citations, methodology | One-line index only | GPT-5 | Index it rather than summarize it. |
Editorial opinion from ZeroTwo, which publishes this page and sells access to these models. Model names are as listed in the ZeroTwo app; availability depends on your plan. See all on the models page.
No source deck with matching outputs is published on this page, so there is no sample result to show you. These checks let you produce one on your own file in a few minutes.
Ask for every slide number and title before any summary. If a number is missing or the order drifts from your deck, the file did not come through the way you expect. Fix that first.
Ask for a slide number on every bullet. A claim with no slide behind it is the first one to check, and the cheapest way to catch an invented one.
Compare each figure with the slide. For charts, ask the model to state the axis labels and the values it read, then look at the chart. If a value is not printed on the slide, treat it as an estimate.
This page does not document how speaker notes are handled. Ask the model to quote any note it relied on. If nothing comes back and your deck has notes, they were not read.
Summarize this deck. 1. First list every slide number and its title. 2. Then give a one-sentence TL;DR. 3. Then bullets in slide order, each ending with (slide N). 4. Then action items with an owner, each ending with (slide N). 5. Quote any speaker note you relied on. 6. Mark any number or chart value you could not read clearly as [unclear].
For a high-stakes deck, send the same file to a second model and read only the claims where the two disagree. Once the summary is checked, you can turn the reviewed summary into a new presentation.
ZeroTwo publishes this page, so read the verdicts with that in mind. Sometimes the right answer is a tool you already have.
Use this workflow if
You are not inside PowerPoint, or you want to choose the model and compare two on a slide-heavy deck.
Use Copilot in PowerPoint if
Microsoft's support page says Copilot in PowerPoint can summarize presentations of up to about 40,000 words and shows references to where it drew information, and that Copilot may not be available depending on your subscription or organisation settings (Microsoft Support, read October 2026).
Use the PDF summarizer if
Slide structure is gone once a deck is flattened, so a long PDF suits AI PDF summarizer better.
Use Google Slides tools if
Start from Chat with Google Slides, or export the deck and upload the file, then run the structure check.
A summary is a triage tool. It earns its place when you need to decide what to read, and it fails when the detail is the point.
Free is enough to run the structure check on one deck. On paid plans, model runs draw from one monthly credit pool, and heavier models and larger decks use more of it. Model selection widens on paid plans, so comparing two models may need one.
$0/mo
$14.99/mo
$29.99/mo
$26.99/mo billed annually
Full allowances are on the pricing page.
Open ZeroTwo chat, upload the deck, and pick a model. Ask for every slide number and title first, then a TL;DR, bullets in slide order that each cite a slide number, and action items. Compare the slide list with your deck before you trust anything else. The prompt on this page is a ready-made version of that request.
This page does not claim that. Routing is manual: you choose the model for each run, and the routing matrix is a set of starting points for that choice. It is our reasoning about which model to try first, not the result of a test.
That depends on the model and on how clear the chart is. Ask the model to state the axis labels and the values it read, then compare them with the slide. A value that is not printed on the slide is an estimate, so do not forward it as a figure without checking.
This page does not document how speaker notes are handled. Ask the model to quote any note it relied on. If your deck has notes and none come back, they were not read, and you can paste them into the chat.
No timing was measured for this page, so there is no number to quote. It depends on the size of the deck, the model you choose and whether images are read. Time your own deck once and you will know.
Microsoft's support page says Copilot in PowerPoint can summarize presentations of up to approximately 40,000 words, with references to where information came from, if Copilot is part of your Microsoft 365 subscription and your organisation allows it (read October 2026). For ChatGPT, check OpenAI's current help pages for supported file types and limits, because they change. The difference with ZeroTwo is a choice of models and the ability to compare two on the same deck.
Yes. The Free plan starts with 100 free credits and adds 20 bonus credits every day you log in, with 1 file upload per message and a limited model selection, with no card required. Pro is $29.99 per month ($26.99 per month billed annually). Model runs draw from one monthly credit pool, and heavier models and larger decks use more of it.
To produce a summary, the content of your deck is processed by the model you choose, which for most models means a third-party AI provider. Read the privacy policy and your chosen provider's terms before you upload a confidential deck, and follow your organisation's data-handling rules.
Privacy questions are answered in full in the privacy policy.
Long PDFs and reports, when slide structure no longer matters.
Build a new deck from a reviewed summary or an outline.
Work with a deck that lives in Google Slides.
Summaries of pasted text, articles and notes.
Send the same deck to two models and compare the answers.
The wider set of ZeroTwo tools in one place.
ZeroTwo publishes this page and is one of the tools it describes. The Free plan needs no card.