A working proposal generator for freelancers, consultants, and sales teams. Paste a brief, run it across Claude, GPT, and Gemini at once, and ship the highest-converting version — all from one $19.99/mo workspace.
$19.99/mo · 60+ models · No per-seat fees
Brief
Generate proposalPreview · Section 02 / Problem
The problem. Acme's site converts at 0.6% — roughly half the B2B industrial average. Every additional 0.4% recovers an estimated $1.2M ARR per year.
Three root causes surfaced in discovery: dated brand language, slow product configurator, and a buried RFQ form…
An AI proposal generator drafts a structured client or business proposal from a brief, RFP, or set of discovery notes. The good ones do not hand you a wall of text — they output a defined sequence of sections (cover, problem, approach, scope, timeline, investment, next steps) that maps to how buyers actually read.
According to Proposify's Close Report, proposals signed within 24 hours close at roughly twice the rate of those that linger. The bottleneck is almost always writing speed, not deal quality. A proposal generator collapses the writing time from hours to minutes so the document arrives while the conversation is still warm.
ZeroTwo's twist: instead of locking you into one model, every section is drafted in parallel by Claude, GPT, and Gemini. You pick the best phrasing per section. The result reads less like AI and more like your strongest week of writing.
Value asset · copy-paste
Each section ships with the prompt we use inside ZeroTwo. Paste it into chat with your discovery notes and you have a defensible first draft in under ten minutes.
Set the frame and confirm scope at a glance.
Draft a one-page proposal cover for a [project type] for [client]. Include project title, prepared-for, prepared-by, date, and a one-sentence summary of the outcome we are committing to. Tone: confident, specific, no buzzwords.
Restate the client's problem in their own words to prove fit.
Using these discovery notes [paste notes], write a 120-word "Problem" section. Mirror the client's vocabulary. End with the cost of inaction in dollars or hours.
Show how you will solve it without giving away the playbook.
Write a 150-word "Approach" section describing our 3-phase methodology to solve [problem]. Reference one relevant case study. Avoid jargon; a non-technical buyer must understand it.
Bullet exactly what is in — and what is not — to prevent scope creep.
List "In Scope" and "Out of Scope" as two bullet groups for a [engagement type]. 5–8 bullets each. Be ruthlessly specific (deliverables, formats, review cycles).
Anchor expectations with phases and milestones, not vague months.
Build a phased timeline table: Phase | Weeks | Milestones | Client inputs needed. Total duration [X] weeks. Flag dependencies that could slip the date.
Frame price as investment, anchor with options, end with a single recommended path.
Write an "Investment" section presenting 3 packages (Essential / Recommended / Premium) for [engagement]. Include what each tier includes, the fee, and a one-line ROI rationale. Recommend the middle tier explicitly.
Make signing the easiest action on the page.
Write a 60-word "Next Steps" section with three numbered actions: (1) sign + return, (2) kickoff date, (3) what we send within 48 hours of signing. Add a clear single CTA line at the end.
A formal RFP is the worst place to use one AI model. Buyers read dozens of responses; tonal sameness is the kiss of death. ZeroTwo runs the same RFP brief across three frontier models in parallel, then lets you assemble the strongest answer per requirement.
Drop the requirements list and any context documents into ZeroTwo. The chat handles long-context briefs natively.
Send to Claude, GPT, and Gemini with one click. Each returns a full draft response in roughly 60 seconds.
Read the three drafts in parallel columns. Differences in phrasing, structure, and emphasis surface immediately.
Pick the strongest answer per requirement. Edit for voice. Export to your signing tool of choice.
~2×
Win-rate lift when proposals are signed within 24 hours, per Proposify's Close Report.
65%
Share of B2B buyers reporting that vendor proposals look interchangeable, according to PandaDoc's State of Proposals.
57%
Of the buying journey is complete before a vendor is contacted — per the Adamson & Dixon HBR analysis, The End of Solution Sales. The proposal's job is to confirm, not convince.
+26%
Open-rate improvement reported by Better Proposals' State of Proposals for documents under 10 pages — short and structured beats long.
38%
Average win rate that benchmark sales studies (e.g. Bidsketch) report for proposals that include explicit pricing options and a recommended package — versus a single line-item quote.
Paste the brief once, see Claude / GPT / Gemini drafts side-by-side, ship the strongest version.
Open the chat workspace| Capability | ZeroTwo | PandaDoc | Better Proposals | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-model drafting (compare phrasing) | Yes — Claude, GPT, Gemini side-by-side | No | No | Single model only |
| Built-in 7-section template | Yes | Yes (heavy editor) | Yes | Manual prompting |
| RFP-to-response workflow | Paste RFP → 3-model draft | Add-on | Manual | Manual |
| E-signature + pipeline | No (pair with your tool) | Yes | Yes | No |
| Pricing | $19.99/mo flat | $35–$65/user/mo | $19–$49/user/mo | $20/mo (one model) |
Pricing pulled from public pages May 2026; verify directly with each vendor.
“The proposal is not where you sell; it's where you confirm what you've already sold.”
ZeroTwo Editorial
Practitioners shipping proposals across consulting, agency, and SaaS pipelines. We test every workflow against real client deals before we publish.
Published 2026-05-03
Updated 2026-05-03
60+ models. One workspace. $19.99/mo. Free to start — no card required.
Start free — draft a proposal in 10 minutes