ZeroTwo home

Misc

Misc models and system prompts

Fellou Browser

Fellou browser AI assistant (ASI X Inc.) executing tasks via deepAction tool delegation, webpage analysis with webpageQa, task scheduling, and memory management for multi-step browser automation.

Kagi Assistant

Kagi Search multi-agent AI assistant with strict markdown formatting guidelines, LaTeX math support, user-centric organization, conciseness emphasis, and metric/24-hour time format preferences.

Le Chat

Le Chat by Mistral AI (knowledge cutoff November 2024) with web search, news search, image generation, and Python code interpreter — prefers tables over lists and uses widget-based search result displays.

Raycast AI

Raycast AI assistant with LaTeX math support using escaped brackets, US regional settings (America/New_York timezone, Fahrenheit, feet, pounds), and markdown/table formatting configuration.

Sesame AI Maya

Sesame AI Maya voice assistant with natural conversational brevity, witty and curious personality, human-like disfluencies, avoidance of AI clichés, and Sesame AI company/technology background context.

Warp 2.0 Agent

Warp 2.0 terminal AI agent for software development — handles simple questions with direct instructions and complex tasks with code editing tools, VCS integration, and prohibition of interactive terminal commands.

Notion AI

Notion AI integrated chat assistant for creating/editing pages, databases, views, and custom agents — with full workspace knowledge, form support, Notion-flavored markdown, and compressed URL citation handling.

T3 Chat

T3 Chat assistant powered by Gemini 3 Flash (identifies as Kimi K2 when asked) — uses escaped-parenthesis LaTeX math, Prettier-formatted code at 80 characters, and restricts large-number counting tasks.

About the Misc system prompts

This collection holds 8 Misc system prompts, covering Fellou Browser, Kagi Assistant and Le Chat. Each entry is the instruction text that sits above the conversation and shapes how the model answers — its role, its tone, the tools it may reach for, and the things it must refuse. Reading them is the fastest way to understand why a Misc model behaves the way it does, and the fastest way to borrow patterns that already work.

Every prompt on this page is reproduced in full, with no truncation or paraphrase, so you can copy the exact wording into your own build and compare it line by line against the prompts other providers ship.

How to use them

Treat a Misc prompt as a starting structure, not a script to paste unchanged. The parts worth keeping are the scaffolding: how the role is stated up front, how tool use is gated, how refusals are worded, and how output format is pinned down. The parts worth replacing are the product-specific details — feature names, brand voice, and any capability your own model does not have.

A prompt tuned for one model rarely transfers cleanly to another. Context windows, tool-calling conventions, and refusal behaviour all differ, so run a short evaluation set through your target model before you rely on a borrowed prompt in production.

What is a system prompt?

A system prompt is the hidden first message in a conversation. The user never sees it, but the model reads it before every reply, which makes it the single strongest lever over an assistant’s behaviour — stronger than few-shot examples and, in most cases, stronger than anything the user types afterwards. That is why published and leaked system prompts are studied so closely: they are the clearest available record of how a production assistant was actually built.

How to read one critically

A system prompt is a snapshot, not a specification. Providers revise them continuously, sometimes weekly, and a prompt captured in one release may already be out of date — so treat the date on an entry as part of the evidence. Length is not quality either: some of the most effective prompts here are a few hundred words, while others run to tens of thousands because they carry an entire tool schema inline.

The most transferable material is usually the negative space — the explicit “do not” rules and the tie-breakers that tell the model what to do when two instructions conflict. Those are the parts written after something went wrong in production, which makes them the parts worth copying.